Evolving Climate Risk Expectations for UK Banks (SS5/25 via PS25/25)

On 3 December 2025, the PRA published its final Policy Statement PS25/25 on climate-related financial risks. The final expectations now sit in Supervisory Statement SS5/25 ‘Enhancing banks’ and insurers’ approaches to managing climate-related risks’, which immediately replaces the old SS3/19. The changes enhance requirements in areas such as governance, risk management, scenario analysis, data, and disclosure.

Read More
Basel 3.1, Regulatory updates Anindya Ghosh chowdhury Basel 3.1, Regulatory updates Anindya Ghosh chowdhury

Basel 3.1 Implementation Guide

Katalysys recently hosted a roundtable in collaboration with UK Finance and representatives from the PRA, where we discussed the practical challenges firms are facing in preparing for implementation. Based on those discussions and our ongoing work supporting several institutions with Basel 3.1 readiness, we have produced a white paper focusing on the key areas of implementation that carry the greatest risk.

Read More
Regulatory updates, Basel 3.1 Anindya Ghosh chowdhury Regulatory updates, Basel 3.1 Anindya Ghosh chowdhury

Katalysys’ new training with UK Finance on Basel 3.1 implementation

Hosted by UK Finance, Katalysys is pleased to announce a training programme, “The Basel Breakthrough: Future-Proofing Regulatory Reporting for 2027”, aimed at equipping banks and financial institutions with the knowledge, tools and strategies to navigate the forthcoming Basel 3.1 reforms.

Read More
Basel 3.1, Regulatory updates Manish Patidar Basel 3.1, Regulatory updates Manish Patidar

Basel 3.1 Data Collection Exercise - Resumed

As part of PS9/24, the PRA announced an off-cycle review of Pillar 2 capital requirements to address double-counting, rebase Pillar 2A, and mitigate unintended impacts from changes in Pillar 1 RWAs. Although delayed, the process has now resumed with revised reference dates. Firms must provide specified information as at 31 December 2025, with submissions due by 31 March 2026.

Read More

How Severe Should a Liquidity Stress Test Be?

Liquidity stress testing remains a cornerstone of effective risk management and regulatory compliance for banks. However, a persistent challenge lies in interpreting what constitutes a “severe but plausible” stress scenario, particularly in the context of evolving depositor behaviours and increasing digitalisation of banking.

This paper aims to address this challenge by examining how stress scenarios can be robustly calibrated using empirical evidence backed by statistical methods, with particular focus on liquidity stress testing informing the Internal Liquidity Adequacy Assessment Process (ILAAP).

Read More